UNDERSTAND IT. WORK IT OUT.

Learn: Classical retaining-wall overturning FS

A retaining wall needs a consistent balance against overturning. This traditional overall factor of safety compares the supplied resisting total with the supplied driving total; it does not derive those totals from geometry.

Beginner-friendlyFree · No accountTwo worked examples + separate practice
01

What the formula is saying

Divide resisting moment by overturning moment, both taken about the same chosen pivot.

FSOT = ΣMR / ΣMO

Read the symbols in plain language

ΣMR
Resisting moments

Resisting moments. Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

kN·m/m

Use kN·m/m as the base unit shown here. Both totals use kN·m/m, on the same per-metre wall basis, so the final ratio is dimensionless. Use nonnegative resisting magnitude and a strictly positive driving magnitude.

ΣMO
Overturning moments

Overturning moments. Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

kN·m/m

Use kN·m/m as the base unit shown here. Both totals use kN·m/m, on the same per-metre wall basis, so the final ratio is dimensionless. Use nonnegative resisting magnitude and a strictly positive driving magnitude.

FSOT
Result to find

Classical retaining-wall overturning FS. Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

ratio / no unit

Sort out the units first

Both totals use kN·m/m, on the same per-metre wall basis, so the final ratio is dimensionless. Use nonnegative resisting magnitude and a strictly positive driving magnitude.

Assumptions before calculating

This is an idealized study model with supplied soil parameters and loading. Ground investigation, drainage condition, groundwater, geometry and the governing design approach must be established by the responsible geotechnical design process.

02

Let’s solve one together

Read the given values, follow each operation, then check what the result means.

Read the supplied values as one complete study case. Find FSOT and explain the result in the stated output unit.

ΣMR · Resisting moments
800 kN·m/m
ΣMO · Overturning moments
300 kN·m/m
  1. Identify the justified resisting total

    Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

    (800) = 800 kN·m/m
  2. Compare with the driving total

    Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

    (800) ÷ (300) ≈ 2.666666667
Answer2.666666667Dimensionless result; see the units explanation.

Does this worked answer make sense?

A ratio of 1 means equality of the supplied resisting and driving totals, not automatic design acceptance. Doubling the driving total halves the ratio if resistance stays fixed.

A second worked example — different values

A second case uses different data. Predict which way the answer will change, then calculate it without reusing the first answer.

ΣMR · Resisting moments
1200 kN·m/m
ΣMO · Overturning moments
500 kN·m/m
  1. Identify the justified resisting total

    Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

    (1200) = 1200 kN·m/m
  2. Compare with the driving total

    Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

    (1200) ÷ (500) = 2.4
Answer2.4Dimensionless result; see the units explanation.
03

Now try your own values

Change a value or its unit. The same method will show your calculation, step by step.

Resisting moments. Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

Overturning moments. Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

English, Arabic and Persian digits are supported. The steps convert inputs to the formula’s base units.

Results update only when you calculate. The lesson example above stays unchanged.

04

Your turn — check your understanding

Solve this separate case yourself. Use only the values below; the two worked examples use different data. Give the requested result in the selected unit.

ΣMR · Resisting moments
900 kN·m/m
ΣMO · Overturning moments
400 kN·m/m

Find: Learn: Classical retaining-wall overturning FS

For repeating decimals, use at least four significant figures. Accepted rounding tolerance: 0.05% of the expected value; zero uses an absolute tolerance of 10⁻¹².

A hint, not the answer

Divide resisting moment by overturning moment, both taken about the same chosen pivot.

Both totals use kN·m/m, on the same per-metre wall basis, so the final ratio is dimensionless. Use nonnegative resisting magnitude and a strictly positive driving magnitude.

Show the full practice solution

Compare the steps with your work; revealing a solution does not mark the lesson complete.

  1. Identify the justified resisting total

    Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

    (900) = 900 kN·m/m
  2. Compare with the driving total

    Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

    (900) ÷ (400) = 2.25
Answer2.25Dimensionless result; see the units explanation.

Avoid the common trap

Do not reverse resistance and demand or combine factored and unfactored totals without a coherent design method. Do not compare moments about different pivots or omit the lever arm of water pressure.

When this method applies — and when it does not

This is a global-factor study check, not an automatic Eurocode partial-factor verification. All forces and lever arms must use the same pivot, and stabilizing actions may require different treatment from destabilizing actions. Bearing, contact, settlement, structural resistance and overall stability remain separate.

For study and understanding, not approval of a real structure, site operation or design. Apply the correct standard, National Annex and professional review to actual engineering work.

One idea understood. Keep going.

This optional checkmark is saved only in this browser. It is your own progress note, not a certificate.

Sources & further reading

References open in a new tab and explain the underlying principles. The teaching text and examples here are SimpleFlick’s own; the source organisations have not endorsed this calculator.

Reading focus: Classical retaining-wall overturning FS. Read the relevant soil phase, seepage, earth-pressure, settlement or foundation topic. Effective stress, drainage and idealized geometry determine whether the relationship applies.

Lesson updated: · Both examples and the separate practice case are checked against an independent high-precision numerical implementation. This verifies arithmetic for the stated model, not engineering certification.

Menu