UNDERSTAND IT. WORK IT OUT.

Learn: Classical retaining-wall sliding FS

A retaining wall needs a consistent balance against sliding. This traditional overall factor of safety compares the supplied resisting total with the supplied driving total; it does not derive those totals from geometry.

Beginner-friendlyFree · No accountTwo worked examples + separate practice
01

What the formula is saying

Divide resisting force by driving horizontal force.

FSslide = R / H

Read the symbols in plain language

R
Total resisting force

Total resisting force. Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

kN/m

Use kN/m as the base unit shown here. Both totals use kN/m, on the same per-metre wall basis, so the final ratio is dimensionless. Use nonnegative resisting magnitude and a strictly positive driving magnitude.

H
Total horizontal driving force

Total horizontal driving force. Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

kN/m

Use kN/m as the base unit shown here. Both totals use kN/m, on the same per-metre wall basis, so the final ratio is dimensionless. Use nonnegative resisting magnitude and a strictly positive driving magnitude.

FSslide
Result to find

Classical retaining-wall sliding FS. Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

ratio / no unit

Sort out the units first

Both totals use kN/m, on the same per-metre wall basis, so the final ratio is dimensionless. Use nonnegative resisting magnitude and a strictly positive driving magnitude.

Assumptions before calculating

This is an idealized study model with supplied soil parameters and loading. Ground investigation, drainage condition, groundwater, geometry and the governing design approach must be established by the responsible geotechnical design process.

02

Let’s solve one together

Read the given values, follow each operation, then check what the result means.

Read the supplied values as one complete study case. Find FSslide and explain the result in the stated output unit.

R · Total resisting force
300 kN/m
H · Total horizontal driving force
150 kN/m
  1. Identify the justified resisting total

    Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

    (300) = 300 kN/m
  2. Compare with the driving total

    Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

    (300) ÷ (150) = 2
Answer2Dimensionless result; see the units explanation.

Does this worked answer make sense?

A ratio of 1 means equality of the supplied resisting and driving totals, not automatic design acceptance. Doubling the driving total halves the ratio if resistance stays fixed.

A second worked example — different values

A second case uses different data. Predict which way the answer will change, then calculate it without reusing the first answer.

R · Total resisting force
400 kN/m
H · Total horizontal driving force
250 kN/m
  1. Identify the justified resisting total

    Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

    (400) = 400 kN/m
  2. Compare with the driving total

    Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

    (400) ÷ (250) = 1.6
Answer1.6Dimensionless result; see the units explanation.
03

Now try your own values

Change a value or its unit. The same method will show your calculation, step by step.

Total resisting force. Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

Total horizontal driving force. Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

English, Arabic and Persian digits are supported. The steps convert inputs to the formula’s base units.

Results update only when you calculate. The lesson example above stays unchanged.

04

Your turn — check your understanding

Solve this separate case yourself. Use only the values below; the two worked examples use different data. Give the requested result in the selected unit.

R · Total resisting force
360 kN/m
H · Total horizontal driving force
180 kN/m

Find: Learn: Classical retaining-wall sliding FS

For repeating decimals, use at least four significant figures. Accepted rounding tolerance: 0.05% of the expected value; zero uses an absolute tolerance of 10⁻¹².

A hint, not the answer

Divide resisting force by driving horizontal force.

Both totals use kN/m, on the same per-metre wall basis, so the final ratio is dimensionless. Use nonnegative resisting magnitude and a strictly positive driving magnitude.

Show the full practice solution

Compare the steps with your work; revealing a solution does not mark the lesson complete.

  1. Identify the justified resisting total

    Only compatible, available and correctly referenced resistance components belong in this total.

    (360) = 360 kN/m
  2. Compare with the driving total

    Divide matching force or moment totals to obtain the stated global safety ratio.

    (360) ÷ (180) = 2
Answer2Dimensionless result; see the units explanation.

Avoid the common trap

Do not reverse resistance and demand or combine factored and unfactored totals without a coherent design method. Do not rely on passive soil that may be excavated or cannot mobilize.

When this method applies — and when it does not

This is a global-factor study check, not an automatic Eurocode partial-factor verification. Base friction, adhesion, passive resistance and uplift must be included only where justified and mobilizable. Bearing, contact, settlement, structural resistance and overall stability remain separate.

For study and understanding, not approval of a real structure, site operation or design. Apply the correct standard, National Annex and professional review to actual engineering work.

One idea understood. Keep going.

This optional checkmark is saved only in this browser. It is your own progress note, not a certificate.

Sources & further reading

References open in a new tab and explain the underlying principles. The teaching text and examples here are SimpleFlick’s own; the source organisations have not endorsed this calculator.

Reading focus: Classical retaining-wall sliding FS. Read the relevant soil phase, seepage, earth-pressure, settlement or foundation topic. Effective stress, drainage and idealized geometry determine whether the relationship applies.

Lesson updated: · Both examples and the separate practice case are checked against an independent high-precision numerical implementation. This verifies arithmetic for the stated model, not engineering certification.

Menu